From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sullivan v. Taylor

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Feb 10, 2022
2:17-cv-00763-MK (D. Or. Feb. 10, 2022)

Opinion

2:17-cv-00763-MK

02-10-2022

EMMIT JOHN SULLIVAN, Petitioner, v. JERI TAYLOR, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution, Respondent.


ORDER

Michael McShane United States District Judge

Magistrate Judge Mustafa Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 94), and the matter is now before this court on Petitioner's objections. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). I review de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is correct.

Magistrate Judge Kasubhai's Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 94) is adopted. The Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 75) is DENIED. Because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a Certificate of Appealability is also DENIED. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sullivan v. Taylor

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Feb 10, 2022
2:17-cv-00763-MK (D. Or. Feb. 10, 2022)
Case details for

Sullivan v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:EMMIT JOHN SULLIVAN, Petitioner, v. JERI TAYLOR, Superintendent, Eastern…

Court:United States District Court, District of Oregon

Date published: Feb 10, 2022

Citations

2:17-cv-00763-MK (D. Or. Feb. 10, 2022)