From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sullivan v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Sep 30, 2016
200 So. 3d 1286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 2D15–1397.

09-30-2016

Diane C. SULLIVAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Stephen M. Grogoza, Naples, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Katherine Coombs Cline, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Stephen M. Grogoza, Naples, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Katherine Coombs Cline, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We have for our consideration an appeal from county court where a question of great public importance was certified, and we accepted jurisdiction pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.160(e)(2). The Collier County Court, pursuant to rule 9.030(b)(4), certified the following question to this court as involving a matter of great public importance:

WHETHER A SISTER STATE'S MOTOR VEHICLE RECORD, ADMITTED INTO EVIDENCE UNDER CHAPTER 90.902, FLORIDA STATUTES, IS SUFFICIENT TO ESTABLISH THE ELEMENT OF A PRIOR ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION FOR A REFUSAL TO SUBMIT TO TESTING?

Upon further consideration of the parties' briefs and oral arguments, we decline to accept this appeal and do not answer the certified question. Accordingly, we transfer this appeal to the Twentieth Judicial Circuit of Florida, appellate division, pursuant to rule 9.160(f)(2).

NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and SALARIO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sullivan v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Sep 30, 2016
200 So. 3d 1286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Sullivan v. State

Case Details

Full title:DIANE C. SULLIVAN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

Date published: Sep 30, 2016

Citations

200 So. 3d 1286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)