Sullivan v. State

Full title: DANIEL RAY SULLIVAN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Aug 3, 1984

453 So. 2d 537 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

Nos. 83-1919, 83-1915 to 83-1918.

August 3, 1984.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Hillsborough County; Harry Lee Coe III, Judge.

Jerry Hill, Public Defender, Bartow, and Amelia G. Brown, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Katherine V. Blanco, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the trial court's revocation of defendant's probation and in the trial court's sentencing of defendant on the convictions for which defendant had received probation. This is without prejudice to defendant filing a motion under Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.850 on grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel. See Williams v. State, 438 So.2d 781, 786 (Fla. 1983).

AFFIRMED.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and OTT and LEHAN, JJ., concur.