From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sullivan v. Outreach

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Feb 24, 2011
2:07-cv-1122-PMP-RJJ (D. Nev. Feb. 24, 2011)

Opinion

2:07-cv-1122-PMP-RJJ.

February 24, 2011


ORDER


This matter is before the undersigned Magistrate Judge on Defendant Anil Kothari's Declaration (#135).

The Court having reviewed the Declaration (#135) finds that Defendant Kothari is requesting a telephone conference call regarding possible settlement of this case. The Court having considered the request contained in the Declaration (#135) and good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the request for a telephone conference call is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Anil Kothari and Hemangini Kothari must be present on February 28, 2011, in Las Vegas, Nevada for the taking of their depositions as previously ordered by the court.

DATED this 24th day of February, 2011.


Summaries of

Sullivan v. Outreach

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Feb 24, 2011
2:07-cv-1122-PMP-RJJ (D. Nev. Feb. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Sullivan v. Outreach

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK SULLIVAN, et al., Plaintiff, v. GLOBAL OUTREACH, et al., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Feb 24, 2011

Citations

2:07-cv-1122-PMP-RJJ (D. Nev. Feb. 24, 2011)