From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sullivan v. Malone

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Feb 10, 2023
No. 22-2157 (8th Cir. Feb. 10, 2023)

Opinion

22-2157

02-10-2023

George T. Sullivan Plaintiff Appellant v. Vetis S. Malone, Corporal, Varner Supermax; Brandon C. Carroll, Chief of Security, Major, Varner Supermax Defendants Appellees


Unpublished

Submitted: January 30, 2023

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central

Before GRUENDER, MELLOY, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

George Sullivan appeals following the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After careful review of the record, we find no basis for reversal. See Morris v. Cradduck, 954 F.3d 1055, 1058 (8th Cir. 2020) (reviewing de novo grant of summary judgment); Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (reviewing de novo 28 U.S.C. § 1915A dismissal). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Sullivan's pending motion.

The Honorable Kristine G. Baker, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jerome T. Kearney, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.


Summaries of

Sullivan v. Malone

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Feb 10, 2023
No. 22-2157 (8th Cir. Feb. 10, 2023)
Case details for

Sullivan v. Malone

Case Details

Full title:George T. Sullivan Plaintiff Appellant v. Vetis S. Malone, Corporal…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Feb 10, 2023

Citations

No. 22-2157 (8th Cir. Feb. 10, 2023)