From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sullivan v. Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jul 7, 2006
Civil Action No. 04-cv-1539-ZLW-CBS (D. Colo. Jul. 7, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 04-cv-1539-ZLW-CBS.

July 7, 2006


ORDER


The matter before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion For Reconsideration. Plaintiff asks that the Court reconsider the Order granting Defendant's motion for summary judgment with respect to Plaintiff's Title VII retaliation claim, based on the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White. The Court held inBurlington that in order to establish Title VII retaliation the plaintiff must show that a reasonable employee would have found the defendant employer's challenged action materially adverse, meaning that it "might well have dissuaded a reasonable worker from making or supporting a charge of discrimination." Having reviewed the evidence submitted on summary judgment, the Court concludes that Plaintiff did not submit any evidence meeting theBurlington standard. Accordingly, it is

No. 05-259, 2006 WL 1698953 (U.S. June 22, 2006).

Id. at *10 (internal quotations and citations omitted).

ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion For Reconsideration (Doc. No. 70) is denied.


Summaries of

Sullivan v. Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jul 7, 2006
Civil Action No. 04-cv-1539-ZLW-CBS (D. Colo. Jul. 7, 2006)
Case details for

Sullivan v. Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KATHRYN A. SULLIVAN, Plaintiff, v. LAIDLAW TRANSIT SERVICES, INC.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Jul 7, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 04-cv-1539-ZLW-CBS (D. Colo. Jul. 7, 2006)