From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sullivan v. Apfel

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Oct 2, 2000
Civil Action No. 99-0660-CB-L (S.D. Ala. Oct. 2, 2000)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 99-0660-CB-L.

October 2, 2000.


JUDGMENT


In accordance with the order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying claimant benefits be affirmed.

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and dated this the 12th day of September, 2000 is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.


Summaries of

Sullivan v. Apfel

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Oct 2, 2000
Civil Action No. 99-0660-CB-L (S.D. Ala. Oct. 2, 2000)
Case details for

Sullivan v. Apfel

Case Details

Full title:VIRGINIA SULLIVAN, Plaintiff, v. KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division

Date published: Oct 2, 2000

Citations

Civil Action No. 99-0660-CB-L (S.D. Ala. Oct. 2, 2000)

Citing Cases

Martin v. Astrue

Cannon, 858 F.2d at 1546. Sullivan v. Apfel, 2000 WL 1568330, *8 (S.D. Ala. Oct. 2, 2000). The letter at…