From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sullen v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Nov 3, 2011
CIVIL NO. C 10-5898 CW (N.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. C 10-5898 CW

11-03-2011

ESTHER SULLEN, Plaintiff v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant

TONY ARJO Attorney for Plaintiff MELINDA L. HAAG United States Attorney By: Brenda M. Pullin (As authorized via email) BRENDA M. PULLIN Special Assistant United States Attorney


TONY ARJO, SBN 151890

Oakland, CA 94612

Attorney for Plaintiff

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the undersigned for the respective parties, subject to the approval of the Court, that the Plaintiff have an extension of time up to and including December 1, 2011 in which to file a Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Remand. The extension is necessary because Plaintiff's attorney substituted in as counsel for the Plaintiff, who representing herself, on November 1, 2011 and has not had sufficient time to review the record and file a Motion within the timeline previously set by the Court.

TONY ARJO

Attorney for Plaintiff

MELINDA L. HAAG

United States Attorney

By: Brenda M. Pullin

(As authorized via email)

BRENDA M. PULLIN

Special Assistant United States Attorney
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiff Esther Sullen shall have up to and including November 1, 2011, to respond file a Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Remand.

CLAUDIA WILKEN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Sullen v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Nov 3, 2011
CIVIL NO. C 10-5898 CW (N.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Sullen v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:ESTHER SULLEN, Plaintiff v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Date published: Nov 3, 2011

Citations

CIVIL NO. C 10-5898 CW (N.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2011)