From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sukel v. Eisel

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
Apr 21, 2020
228 A.3d 408 (Del. 2020)

Opinion

No. 158, 2019

04-21-2020

Owen SUKEL, Respondent Below, Appellant, v. Joy EISEL, Petitioner Below, Appellee.


ORDER

After careful consideration of the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, we find it evident that the judgment of the Family Court should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned in the Family Court's well-reasoned March 14, 2019 order, which affirmed the Commissioner's order granting the appellee's petition for a protection from abuse order. The Family Court did not abuse its discretion in accepting the Commissioner's order, and the appellant's allegation of bias on the part of either the Family Court or the Commissioner is not supported by the record.

See King v. Booker , 2015 WL 4985367, at *2 ("If the Family Court has correctly applied the law, our standard of review is abuse of discretion.").
--------

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Family Court is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Sukel v. Eisel

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
Apr 21, 2020
228 A.3d 408 (Del. 2020)
Case details for

Sukel v. Eisel

Case Details

Full title:OWEN SUKEL, Respondent Below, Appellant, v. JOY EISEL, Petitioner Below…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

Date published: Apr 21, 2020

Citations

228 A.3d 408 (Del. 2020)