From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Suggs v. People

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 4, 2009
No. CIV S-09-2590 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-2590 EFB P.

November 4, 2009


ORDER


Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

Examination of the in forma pauperis affidavit reveals that petitioner is unable to afford the costs of suit.

A petitioner seeking a writ of habeas corpus must name as respondent the person having custody over him. 28 U.S.C. § 2242; Rule 2(a), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. This person ordinarily is the warden of the facility where petitioner is confined. See Stanley v. California Supreme Court, 21 F.3d 359, 360 (9th Cir. 1994). Petitioner names as respondent the People of the State of California, who does not have custody over petitioner. Petitioner has not named the proper respondent.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted; and,

2. The September 16, 2009 petition is dismissed with leave to file an amended petition naming the proper respondent within 30 days of the date of this order. Petitioner's failure to file an amended petition may result in this action being dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send to petitioner the form Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus used in this court.


Summaries of

Suggs v. People

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 4, 2009
No. CIV S-09-2590 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2009)
Case details for

Suggs v. People

Case Details

Full title:TYSON JOIEL SUGGS, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 4, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-09-2590 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2009)