From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Suffolk Cnty. Water Auth. v. Dow Chem. Co.

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
Jan 3, 2013
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 60108 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2012-07097 Index No. 24852/10 M149029

01-03-2013

Suffolk County Water Authority, respondent- appellant, v. Dow Chemical Company, et al., appellants-respondents.


, J.P.

PLUMMER E. LOTT

LEONARD B. AUSTIN

SANDRA L. SGROI, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by Richard Steven Baron, Brian Harris Phinney, and Benjamin Lee Fruchey, attorneys in good standing in the State of Michigan, to be admitted pro hac vice to represent the appellant-respondent Hoyt Corporation on an appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated January 18, 2012.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted.

BALKIN, J.P., LOTT, AUSTIN and SGROI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court


Summaries of

Suffolk Cnty. Water Auth. v. Dow Chem. Co.

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
Jan 3, 2013
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 60108 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Suffolk Cnty. Water Auth. v. Dow Chem. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Suffolk County Water Authority, respondent- appellant, v. Dow Chemical…

Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

Date published: Jan 3, 2013

Citations

2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 60108 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)