Opinion
Civil Action 19-1653
04-01-2022
ROGEL SUERO, Petitioner, v. KAUFFMAN, et al., Respondents.
ORDER
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.
AND NOW, this 1st day of April 2022, upon consideration of Petitioner Rogel Suero's pro se Revised Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. No. 10), Respondents' Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 16), the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin (Doc. No. 32), Petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 39), and in accordance with the Opinion of the Court issued this day, it is ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 32) is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The Revised Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 10) is DENIED.
3. A Certificate of Appealability SHALL NOT issue because, based on the analysis contained in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, as approved and adopted by this Court, a reasonable jurist could not conclude that the Court is incorrect in denying and dismissing the Habeas Petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473 (2000).