From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sudberry v. Baca

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jun 17, 2015
3:15-cv-13-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Jun. 17, 2015)

Opinion

3:15-cv-13-RCJ-WGC

06-17-2015

DENNIS K. SUDBERRY, Plaintiff, v. ISIDRO BACA et al., Defendants.


ADDENDUM TO SCREENING ORDER

I. DISCUSSION

On June 16, 2015, this Court entered a screening order dismissing Plantiff's complaint in its entirety, without prejudice, with leave to amend. (ECF No. 16 at 6). The Court now provides the legal standard for leave to amend and sets the deadlines for filing an amended complaint.

Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies of the complaint. If Plaintiff chooses to file an amended complaint he is advised that an amended complaint supersedes the original complaint and, thus, the amended complaint must be complete in itself. See Hal Roach Studios, Inc. v. Richard Feiner & Co., Inc., 896 F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1989) (holding that "[t]he fact that a party was named in the original complaint is irrelevant; an amended pleading supersedes the original"); see also Lacey v. Maricopa Cnty., 693 F.3d 896, 928 (9th Cir. 2012) (holding that for claims dismissed with prejudice, a plaintiff is not required to reallege such claims in a subsequent amended complaint to preserve them for appeal). Plaintiff's amended complaint must contain all claims, defendants, and factual allegations that Plaintiff wishes to pursue in this lawsuit. Moreover, Plaintiff must file the amended complaint on this Court's approved prisoner civil rights form and it must be entitled "First Amended Complaint."

The Court notes that if Plaintiff chooses to file an amended complaint curing the deficiencies of his complaint, as outlined in this order, Plaintiff shall file the amended complaint within 30 days from the date of entry of this order. If Plaintiff chooses not to file an amended complaint curing the stated deficiencies, the Court shall dismiss this action without prejudice.

II. CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall file and docket Plaintiff's complaint (ECF No. 1-1).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff chooses to file an amended complaint curing the deficiencies of his complaint, as outlined in this Court's June 16, 2015 screening order, Plaintiff shall file the amended complaint within 30 days from the date of entry of this order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send to Plaintiff the approved form for filing a § 1983 complaint, instructions for the same, and a copy of his original complaint (ECF No. 1-1). If Plaintiff chooses to file an amended complaint, he must use the approved form and he shall write the words "First Amended" above the words "Civil Rights Complaint" in the caption.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint curing the deficiencies outlined in this screening order, this action shall be dismissed without prejudice.

DATED: This 17th day of June, 2015.

/s/_________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Sudberry v. Baca

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jun 17, 2015
3:15-cv-13-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Jun. 17, 2015)
Case details for

Sudberry v. Baca

Case Details

Full title:DENNIS K. SUDBERRY, Plaintiff, v. ISIDRO BACA et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jun 17, 2015

Citations

3:15-cv-13-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Jun. 17, 2015)