From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sudano v. West

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 6, 2024
CV 24-01586-AB (RAOx) (C.D. Cal. May. 6, 2024)

Opinion

CV 24-01586-AB (RAOx)

05-06-2024

Bruce Sudano v. Kanye Omari West et al


Present: The Honorable ANDRE BIROTTE JR., United States District Judge

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: [In Chambers] Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution

Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).

The below time period(s) has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before May 17, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.

[x] Defendant(s) Kanye Omari West; Yeezy Record Label, LLC; YZY SND did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff(s) have failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(a). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Sudano v. West

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 6, 2024
CV 24-01586-AB (RAOx) (C.D. Cal. May. 6, 2024)
Case details for

Sudano v. West

Case Details

Full title:Bruce Sudano v. Kanye Omari West et al

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: May 6, 2024

Citations

CV 24-01586-AB (RAOx) (C.D. Cal. May. 6, 2024)