From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Subramanian v. Qad Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. California
Mar 5, 2008
No C 06-3050 VRW (N.D. Cal. Mar. 5, 2008)

Opinion

No C 06-3050 VRW.

March 5, 2008


ORDER


On April 29, 2008, plaintiff Mani Subramanian sent a letter to the court, Doc #148, requesting a change in the briefing schedule for various discovery motions set by the court on April 21, 2008. Doc #147. Defendant QAD Inc ("QAD") has not responded to Subramanian's letter, but QAD and Subramanian have filed motion papers in accordance with the original briefing schedule.

Because Subramanian admits that the issues raised by his April 29 letter could be addressed in his opposition to QAD's motion, the court finds modification of the briefing schedule unnecessary. Accordingly, Subramanian's request is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Subramanian v. Qad Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. California
Mar 5, 2008
No C 06-3050 VRW (N.D. Cal. Mar. 5, 2008)
Case details for

Subramanian v. Qad Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MANI SUBRAMANIAN, Plaintiff, v. QAD INC, WILLIAM D CONNELL, AND DOES 1-50…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Mar 5, 2008

Citations

No C 06-3050 VRW (N.D. Cal. Mar. 5, 2008)