Another case, like Bailey, rejects a claim because no argument was made at all; indeed, the plaintiff expressly disclaimed any sort of single-motive theory at the district court. Subotic v. Jabil, Inc., No. 22-13880, 2024 WL 797140 at *6 (11th Cir. Feb. 27, 2024) (unpublished). More persuasive, in our view, is that since Berry was issued at the end of 2023, at least three cases have rejected the idea that the words "convincing mosaic" need to be used at the district court for us to consider a case under the ordinary summary judgment standard on appeal, and another considered a Title VII case that was briefed without explicitly relying on McDonnell Douglas or using the term "convincing mosaic."