From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Suber v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Dec 4, 2015
178 So. 3d 973 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. 5D15–2554.

12-04-2015

Shamir J. SUBER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Shamir J. Suber, Mayo, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Shamir J. Suber, Mayo, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the trial court summarily denied the motion for DNA testing without ordering the State to respond, we reverse. Harris v. State, 40 Fla. L. Weekly D939, 2015 WL 1810370 (Fla. 2d DCA Apr.22, 2015); Cheshire v. State, 872 So.2d 427, 428 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

TORPY, COHEN, and BERGER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Suber v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Dec 4, 2015
178 So. 3d 973 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

Suber v. State

Case Details

Full title:Shamir J. SUBER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Dec 4, 2015

Citations

178 So. 3d 973 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Citing Cases

Robles v. State

See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.853(c)(2). Here, the trial court erred in ruling on Robles's motion without ordering a…