From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Suazo v. Bank of N.Y.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Mar 30, 2016
194 So. 3d 398 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 4D14–3897.

03-30-2016

Adriano SUAZO, Appellant, v. The BANK OF NEW YORK, As Trustee for the Holders of the GE–WMC Asset Backed Pass–Through Certificates, Series 2006–1, Appellee.

David S. Fabrikant of Law Office of David S. Fabrikant, P.A., Stuart, for appellant. Diana B. Matson and Joshua R. Levine of Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.


David S. Fabrikant of Law Office of David S. Fabrikant, P.A., Stuart, for appellant.

Diana B. Matson and Joshua R. Levine of Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court's denial of appellant's motion to set aside foreclosure judgment. We agree with appellee that the court's September 9, 2014 order denied the motion to set aside the foreclosure judgment that was filed on November 3, 2009. The September 9, 2014 order denying a “motion to cancel foreclosure sale” contains an obvious scrivener's error as no motion to cancel sale was pending, nor was a sale even scheduled at the time. The court through its order clearly ruled on the November 3, 2009 motion to set aside judgment, which was the matter that was scheduled for hearing.

None of the arguments raised by appellant on appeal have any merit, and we affirm without further discussion.

Affirmed.

MAY, FORST and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Suazo v. Bank of N.Y.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Mar 30, 2016
194 So. 3d 398 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Suazo v. Bank of N.Y.

Case Details

Full title:Adriano SUAZO, Appellant, v. The BANK OF NEW YORK, As Trustee for the…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Mar 30, 2016

Citations

194 So. 3d 398 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)