From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Suarez v. Martel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 13, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-2637 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-2637 KJN P

10-13-2011

EFRAIN CAZAREZ SUAREZ, Petitioner, v. MIKE MARTEL, Respondents.


ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In his application, petitioner challenges a conviction issued by the Merced County Superior Court. Merced County is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(d).

Petitioner did not pay the filing fee or file an affidavit to proceed in forma pauperis.

Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper division of a court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and

2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at:

United States District Court Eastern District of California
2500 Tulare Street
Fresno, CA 93721

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
suar2637.109


Summaries of

Suarez v. Martel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 13, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-2637 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Suarez v. Martel

Case Details

Full title:EFRAIN CAZAREZ SUAREZ, Petitioner, v. MIKE MARTEL, Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 13, 2011

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-2637 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2011)