From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Su v. Video Only, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 2, 2013
Case No. 11-cv-06716-JST (N.D. Cal. May. 2, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 11-cv-06716-JST

05-02-2013

JULIE SU, Plaintiff, v. VIDEO ONLY, INC., Defendant.


ORDER TO FILE STIPULATION OF

DISMISSAL


Re: Dkt. No. 36

The court docket indicates on May 2, 2013 the parties settled this action. See Dkt. No. 36. Accordingly, all deadlines and hearings in this case are VACATED. By June 17, 2013, the parties shall file either a stipulation of dismissal or a one-page joint statement explaining why they failed to comply with this Order.

Any continuance of the deadline set in this Order requires a showing of good cause. Failure to comply with that deadline may result in sanctions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Su v. Video Only, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 2, 2013
Case No. 11-cv-06716-JST (N.D. Cal. May. 2, 2013)
Case details for

Su v. Video Only, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JULIE SU, Plaintiff, v. VIDEO ONLY, INC., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 2, 2013

Citations

Case No. 11-cv-06716-JST (N.D. Cal. May. 2, 2013)