From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Styers v. Ryan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Feb 9, 2012
No. CV-98-2244-PHX-JAT (D. Ariz. Feb. 9, 2012)

Opinion

No. CV-98-2244-PHX-JAT

02-09-2012

James Lynn Styers, Petitioner, v. Charles L. Ryan, et al., Respondents.


DEATH PENALTY CASE


ORDER

Before the Court is Respondents' motion for extension of time to February 14 to file a response to Petitioner's motion to enter judgment. (Doc. 164.) The motion fails to state the position of opposing counsel or include a proposed form of order, as required by Local Rule Civil 7.3 and Section II.G.1 of the Electronic Case File Administrative Policies and Procedure Manual. Furthermore, it appears the continuance being sought is unnecessary. Petitioner's motion was filed on January 25, 2012. Under Local Rule Civil 7.2(c) and Rule 6 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Respondents' response is due February 13, 2012.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondents' Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. 164) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

_________________

James A. Teilborg

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Styers v. Ryan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Feb 9, 2012
No. CV-98-2244-PHX-JAT (D. Ariz. Feb. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Styers v. Ryan

Case Details

Full title:James Lynn Styers, Petitioner, v. Charles L. Ryan, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Feb 9, 2012

Citations

No. CV-98-2244-PHX-JAT (D. Ariz. Feb. 9, 2012)