From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stutz v. Transp. Sec. Admin.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Aug 21, 2024
CV 24-4662-JFW(PVCx) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 21, 2024)

Opinion

CV 24-4662-JFW(PVCx)

08-21-2024

Doina C. Stutz v. Transportation Security Administration, et al.


PRESENT: HONORABLE JOHN F. WALTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES -- GENERAL

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

Plaintiff is ordered to show cause, in writing, no later than September 4, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution.

The Court will consider the filing of the following on or before the above date as an appropriate response to this Order to Show Cause:

___ Proof of service of summons and complaint

_X__ Answer by the defendant or an application for entry of default pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a)

___ Motion for entry of default judgment set for hearing in accordance with the Local Rules and the Court's Standing Order

No oral argument on this matter will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause will result in the dismissal of this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Stutz v. Transp. Sec. Admin.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Aug 21, 2024
CV 24-4662-JFW(PVCx) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 21, 2024)
Case details for

Stutz v. Transp. Sec. Admin.

Case Details

Full title:Doina C. Stutz v. Transportation Security Administration, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Aug 21, 2024

Citations

CV 24-4662-JFW(PVCx) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 21, 2024)