From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sturtevant v. Sturtevant

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Oct 31, 1961
174 A.2d 802 (Conn. 1961)

Opinion

Argued October 5, 1961

Decided October 31, 1961

Action to recover payments alleged to be due under a Nevada divorce decree, and for other relief, brought to the Court of Common Pleas in New London County and tried to the court, Barber, J.; judgment for the plaintiff and appeal by the defendant. No error.

Joseph E. Moukawsher, with whom, on the brief, was Griswold Morgan, for the appellant (defendant).

Donald O'Brien, for the appellee (plaintiff).


This appeal is from the judgment rendered on a retrial of this case as the result of our reversal of an earlier judgment. See Sturtevant v. Sturtevant, 146 Conn. 644, 153 A.2d 828. The attempt in the present appeal is to reargue the intent of the parties as expressed in the separation agreement between them. That intent was a principal subject of our prior decision. The trial court correctly determined the defendant's net income in accordance with our conclusion in that decision.


Summaries of

Sturtevant v. Sturtevant

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Oct 31, 1961
174 A.2d 802 (Conn. 1961)
Case details for

Sturtevant v. Sturtevant

Case Details

Full title:BHIMA STURTEVANT v. JAMES M. STURTEVANT

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Oct 31, 1961

Citations

174 A.2d 802 (Conn. 1961)
149 Conn. 727