From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sturgeon v. Unell

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Dec 28, 2021
3:21-cv-2099-X (N.D. Tex. Dec. 28, 2021)

Opinion

3:21-cv-2099-X

12-28-2021

DEXTER STURGEON, JR., TDCJ No. 1650438, Petitioner, v. ATTORNEY GARY UNELL, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

BRANTLEY STARR, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sturgeon v. Unell

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Dec 28, 2021
3:21-cv-2099-X (N.D. Tex. Dec. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Sturgeon v. Unell

Case Details

Full title:DEXTER STURGEON, JR., TDCJ No. 1650438, Petitioner, v. ATTORNEY GARY…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Texas

Date published: Dec 28, 2021

Citations

3:21-cv-2099-X (N.D. Tex. Dec. 28, 2021)

Citing Cases

Lumsden v. Dir., TDCJ-CID

” However, district courts do not have jurisdiction to grant mandamus relief against private actors. Sturgeon…

Lumsden v. Dir., TDCJ-CID

District courts do not have jurisdiction to grant mandamus relief against private actors.” Sturgeon v. Unell,…