From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sturgeon v. Sturgeon

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Feb 23, 1999
984 S.W.2d 859 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)

Summary

holding a court document titled "judgment," filed, but signed by a commissioner rather than a judge was not a judgment under Rule 74.01

Summary of this case from Prof'l Funding Co. v. Bufogle

Opinion

No. 72855.

September 22, 1998. Motion for Rehearing and\or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied November 18, 1998. Application for Transfer Denied February 23, 1999.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, HON. VICTORIA McKEE, JUDGE.

Charles Sturgeon, Maryland Heights, pro se.

Frank Susman, Norton Y. Beilenson, St. Louis, for petitioner/respondent.


Husband appeals from four orders, each denominated "Judgment," entered on June 6, 1997 by Family Court Commissioner Victoria McKee. The orders (1) denied husband's motion for attorney fees on appeal, (2) denied husband's motion for a new trial "as to issues on motion to modify," (3) amended the findings of the decree of dissolution and (4) denied husband's motion to amend a contempt order entered November 14, 1996. Husband filed a pro se notice of appeal on July 15, 1997. The Minutes of Proceedings reflect that the orders have not been signed by any person other than Commissioner McKee. We dismiss the appeal.

As a point of reference, we recognize that a party may appeal from any final judgment. See Rule 81.01; section 512.020, RSMo 1994. Rule 74.01(a) provides that:

"Judgment" as used in these rules includes a decree and any order from which an appeal lies. A judgment is rendered when entered. A judgment is entered when a writing signed by the judge and denominated "judgment" or "decree" is filed. A judgment may be a separate document or included on the docket sheet of the case.

Under this rule, a judgment must be (1) in writing, (2) signed by the judge, (3) denominated "judgment" and (4) filed. Chambers v. Easter Fence Co., Inc., 943 S.W.2d 863, 865 (Mo. App. 1997).

As the Missouri Supreme Court recently stated:

[a]lthough the documents filed in [this] case are denominated "judgment," they are not signed by a judge. Because the documents are not signed by a person selected for office in accordance with and authorized to exercise judicial power by article V of the state constitution, no final and appealable judgment has been entered. . . .

Slay v. Slay, Nos. 80405 to 80407, 1998 WL 130815 at **1 (Mo. banc March 24, 1998). Commissioner McKee was not selected for office in accordance with article V of the Missouri Constitution, therefore this court is without jurisdiction to hear husband's appeal. Id.; Sturgeon v. Sturgeon, No. 72478 slip op. at 2 (Mo. App. 1998).

The appeal is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

James A. Pudlowski, P.J., concurs.

William H. Crandall Jr. J., concurs.


Summaries of

Sturgeon v. Sturgeon

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Feb 23, 1999
984 S.W.2d 859 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)

holding a court document titled "judgment," filed, but signed by a commissioner rather than a judge was not a judgment under Rule 74.01

Summary of this case from Prof'l Funding Co. v. Bufogle
Case details for

Sturgeon v. Sturgeon

Case Details

Full title:ELAINE STURGEON, PETITIONER/RESPONDENT, vs. CHARLES STURGEON…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Feb 23, 1999

Citations

984 S.W.2d 859 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

River Salvage, Inc. v. King

After the revision of Rule 74.01(a) and the decision in Hughes, a document entered by a trial court did not…

Prof'l Funding Co. v. Bufogle

However, since a consent judgment is like any other judgment, it must be entered by the court. Rule 74.01(a)…