From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stunz v. Stunz

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
Jan 29, 2015
NO. CAAP-14-0001159 (Haw. Ct. App. Jan. 29, 2015)

Opinion

NO. CAAP-14-0001159

01-29-2015

CLAY RICHARD STUNZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AMBER BLUE STUNZ, nka AMBER BLUE III, Defendant-Appellant


NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI'I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
(FC-D NO. 11-1-7525)
ORDER APPROVING THE JANUARY 16. 2015 STIPULATION TO DISMISS APPEAL
(By: Foley, Presiding Judge, Leonard and Ginoza, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the Stipulation to Dismiss Appeal, filed January 16, 2015, by Defendant-Appellant Amber Blue Stunz (Appellant), the papers in support, and the record, it appears that (1) the stipulation is dated and signed by counsel for all parties; (2) the parties seek to dismiss the appeal pursuant to Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 42(b); and (3) the parties agree that Appellant "shall pay for all Record on Appeal related costs (i.e. transcript preparation)," otherwise, the parties shall pay their own attorney's fees and costs on appeal.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the stipulation to dismiss the appeal is approved and the appeal is dismissed. Appellant shall pay for all "Record on Appeal related costs (i.e. transcript preparation)," otherwise, the parties shall bear their own appellate costs and fees.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, January 29, 2015.

/s/

Presiding Judge

/s/

Associate Judge

/s/

Associate Judge


Summaries of

Stunz v. Stunz

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
Jan 29, 2015
NO. CAAP-14-0001159 (Haw. Ct. App. Jan. 29, 2015)
Case details for

Stunz v. Stunz

Case Details

Full title:CLAY RICHARD STUNZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AMBER BLUE STUNZ, nka AMBER…

Court:INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

Date published: Jan 29, 2015

Citations

NO. CAAP-14-0001159 (Haw. Ct. App. Jan. 29, 2015)

Citing Cases

Laxy v. Laxy

acquaint himself with the case and never consulted with the defendant and therefore could not determine what…

Tymony v. Tymony

( Lloyd v. Kirkwood, 112 Ill. 329. ) While the guardian ad litem will not be warranted in interposing useless…