Stump v. Minick

Full title: ANDREW STUMP, Petitioner-Appellee, v. BLAYNE MINICK, Respondent-Appellant.

Court: Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Date published: Oct 24, 2024

No. A-1-CA-41782 (N.M. Ct. App. Oct. 24, 2024)

Opinion

A-1-CA-41782

10-24-2024

ANDREW STUMP, Petitioner-Appellee, v. BLAYNE MINICK, Respondent-Appellant.

Andrew Stump Youngtown, AZ Pro Se Appellee. Blayne Minick Las Cruces, NM Pro Se Appellant.

JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Chief Judge.

Corrections to this opinion/decision not affecting the outcome, at the Court's discretion, can occur up to the time of publication with NM Compilation Commission. The Court will ensure that the electronic version of this opinion/decision is updated accordingly in Odyssey.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY Thomas F. Stewart, District Court Judge.

Andrew Stump Youngtown, AZ Pro Se Appellee.

Blayne Minick Las Cruces, NM Pro Se Appellant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Chief Judge.

{¶1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.

{¶2} IT IS SO ORDERED.

WE CONCUR: KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge, KATHERINE A. WRAY, Judge.