From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stull v. Campbell

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 1, 2006
No. CIV S-05-1762 DFL KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-1762 DFL KJM P.

August 1, 2006


ORDER


Petitioner has filed his third motion for an extension of time to file and serve an opposition to respondent's March 13, 2006 motion to dismiss. Good cause appearing, the request will be granted. No further extensions of time will be granted.

The court assumes respondent has received notice, through petitioner's court filings at least, of petitioner's position that the copy of the motion to dismiss with which he was served did not include page 6; the court also assumes respondent is taking steps to ensure petitioner receives a copy of page 6.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's July 27, 2006 motion for an extension of time is granted; and

2. Petitioner is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file and serve an opposition to respondent's March 13, 2006 motion to dismiss. No further extensions of time will be granted.


Summaries of

Stull v. Campbell

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 1, 2006
No. CIV S-05-1762 DFL KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2006)
Case details for

Stull v. Campbell

Case Details

Full title:JAMES CONRAD STULL, Petitioner, v. ROSEANNE CAMPBELL, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 1, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-05-1762 DFL KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2006)