From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Studio 1712, Inc. v. Etna Products Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Jul 10, 1992
968 F.2d 10 (10th Cir. 1992)

Opinion

No. 92-1032.

July 10, 1992.

Before LOGAN, MOORE and EBEL, Circuit Judges.


ORDER


Pursuant to Rule 42(b), Fed.R.App.P., and the stipulation submitted by the parties, this appeal has been settled and is hereby dismissed as moot. The case is remanded to the district court with instructions to vacate the preliminary injunction entered on November 6, 1991, reported at 777 F. Supp. 844 (D.Colo. 1991), and the order modifying the preliminary injunction entered on January 13, 1992. The district court is further directed to dismiss the complaint. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 39-40, 71 S.Ct. 104, 106-107, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950); Beattie v. United States, 949 F.2d 1092, 1095 (10th Cir. 1991); Tosco Corp. v. Hodel, 826 F.2d 948 (10th Cir. 1987).

Each party shall bear its own costs and the mandate shall issue forthwith.


Summaries of

Studio 1712, Inc. v. Etna Products Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Jul 10, 1992
968 F.2d 10 (10th Cir. 1992)
Case details for

Studio 1712, Inc. v. Etna Products Co.

Case Details

Full title:STUDIO 1712, INC., A COLORADO CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. ETNA…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit

Date published: Jul 10, 1992

Citations

968 F.2d 10 (10th Cir. 1992)

Citing Cases

Oklahoma Radio Associates v. F.D.I.C

Id. at 949. Similar dispositions were made where stipulations were filed pursuant to Rule 42(b) of the…