Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Student Public Int. Research Group v. Byrne

86 N.J. 592 (N.J. 1981)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Student Public Int. Research Group v. Byrne

3 Citing cases

  1. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services

    204 N.J. 320 (N.J. 2010)   Cited 550 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NJLAD complaint must be filed within two years of the date on which the cause of action accrued

    Francis v. United Jersey Bank, 87 N.J. 15, 432 A.2d 814 (1981). Student Pub. Interest Research Group v. Byrne, 86 N.J. 592, 432 A.2d 507 (1981). Westfield Ctr. Serv

  2. In re Forsythe et al. Application

    91 N.J. 141 (N.J. 1982)   Cited 9 times
    Permitting intervention by Speaker in pending matter of congressional redistricting amendment

    In reaching this conclusion, we are guided by the purpose and intent of the Constitution. See Student Public Int. ResearchGroup v. Byrne, 86 N.J. 592, 596-601 (1981); Vreeland v.Byrne, 72 N.J. 292, 306-07 (1977); Myers v. United States, 272 U.S. 52, 47 S.Ct. 21, 71 L.Ed. 160 (1927). Courts are admonished to find and to heed the intent of legislators, constitutional as well as statutory.

  3. Francey v. Board of Educ

    286 N.J. Super. 354 (App. Div. 1996)   Cited 3 times
    In Francey, a tenured home economics teacher was laid off in 1989 as part of a reduction in force (RIF) implemented by the Salem City Board of Education.

    "Shall" has also been used to designate a tense or time. See Student Pub. Interest Research Group of N.J.v. Byrne, 86 N.J. 592, 598-99, 432 A.2d 507 (1981) ("shall have been" in the context of the New Jersey constitutional provision concerning salary increases for legislators during their term of office is the use of the future perfect tense identifying "that which must occur before the future event."). But as a commentator on statutory construction has observed: