Opinion
2:22-cv-01964-APG-EJY
02-23-2023
LANCE D. STUCKEY, JR., Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. APEX MATERIALS, LLC, ELKHORN ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC, WERDCO BC, INC., WERDCO LLC, BRENT CONRAD, BRANDON CONRAD, PATRICIA CONRAD, LAS VEGAS PAVING CORPORATION., TAB CONTRACTORS, INC., WILLIAM CHARLES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, HARBER COMPANY, INC., John Does I to XX, name fictitious true name and number of persons being unknown, and XYZ Corporations I to XX, name fictitious true name of number of entities being unknown, Defendants.
LEON GREENBERG, ESQ. RUTHANN DEVEREAUX-GONZALEZ, ESQ. LEON GREENBERG PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Attorneys for Plaintiff LANCE D. STUCKEY, JR. Emil S. Kim MONTGOMERY Y. PAEK, ESQ. EMIL S. KIM, ESQ. MICHAEL D. DISSINGER, ESQ. LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorneys for Defendants APEX MATERIALS, LLC, ELKHORN ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC, WERDCO BC, INC., WERDCO LLC, BRENT CONRAD, BRANDON CONRAD, and PATRICIA CONRAD
LEON GREENBERG, ESQ. RUTHANN DEVEREAUX-GONZALEZ, ESQ. LEON GREENBERG PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Attorneys for Plaintiff LANCE D. STUCKEY, JR.
Emil S. Kim MONTGOMERY Y. PAEK, ESQ. EMIL S. KIM, ESQ. MICHAEL D. DISSINGER, ESQ. LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorneys for Defendants APEX MATERIALS, LLC, ELKHORN ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC, WERDCO BC, INC., WERDCO LLC, BRENT CONRAD, BRANDON CONRAD, and PATRICIA CONRAD
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO COMPLAINT [SECOND REQUEST]
Plaintiff, LANCE D. STUCKEY, JR. (“Plaintiff”), and Defendants, APEX MATERIALS, LLC, ELKHORN ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC, WERDCO BC, INC., WERDCO LLC, BRENT CONRAD, BRANDON CONRAD, and PATRICIA CONRAD (collectively, the “Conrad Defendants”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby agree and stipulate to extend the time for the Conrad Defendants to file a response to the Complaint [ECF No. 1] by forty-five (45) days from the current deadline of February 27, 2023, up to and including April 13, 2023 . This is the second request for an extension of time to respond to the Complaint. The instant request for an extension is necessary because counsel for the Conrad Defendants is currently conducting an initial document collection and review, and the Conrad Defendants and Plaintiff are also exploring potential resolution of this matter. This request is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.
IT IS SO ORDERED.