Opinion
2:22-cv-01964-APG-EJY
01-26-2023
LANCE D. STUCKEY, JR., Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,, Plaintiffs, v. APEX MATERIALS, LLC, ELKHORN ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC, WERDCO BC, INC., WERDCO LLC, BRENT CONRAD, BRANDON CONRAD, PATRICIA CONRAD, LAS VEGAS PAVING CORPORATION., TAB CONTRACTORS, INC., WILLIAM CHARLES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, HARBER COMPANY, INC., John Does I to XX, name fictitious true name and number of persons being unknown, and XYZ Corporations I to XX, name fictitious true name of number of entities being unknown, Defendants.
MONTGOMERY Y. PAEK, ESQ. Bar No. 10176 EMIL S. KIM, ESQ. Bar No. 14894 MICHAEL D. DISSINGER, ESQ. Bar No. 15208 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorneys for Defendants APEX MATERIALS, LLC, ELKHORN ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC, WERDCO BC, INC., WERDCO LLC, BRENT CONRAD, BRANDON CONRAD, AND PATRICIA CONRAD LEON GREENBERG, ESQ. RUTHANN DEVEREAUX-GONZALEZ, ESQ. LEON GREENBERG PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Attorneys for Plaintiff LANCE D. STUCKEY, JR.
MONTGOMERY Y. PAEK, ESQ.
Bar No. 10176
EMIL S. KIM, ESQ.Bar No. 14894
MICHAEL D. DISSINGER, ESQ.
Bar No. 15208
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
Attorneys for Defendants APEX MATERIALS, LLC, ELKHORN ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC, WERDCO BC, INC., WERDCO LLC, BRENT CONRAD, BRANDON CONRAD, AND PATRICIA CONRAD
LEON GREENBERG, ESQ.
RUTHANN DEVEREAUX-GONZALEZ, ESQ. LEON GREENBERG PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Attorneys for Plaintiff LANCE D. STUCKEY, JR.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO COMPLAINT
[FIRST REQUEST]
Plaintiff, LANCE D. STUCKEY, JR. (“Plaintiff”), and Defendants, APEX MATERIALS, LLC, ELKHORN ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC, WERDCO BC, INC., WERDCO LLC, BRENT CONRAD, BRANDON CONRAD, and PATRICIA CONRAD (hereinafter collectively “Defendants”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby agree and stipulate to extend the time for Defendants to file a response to the Complaint from the current deadline of January 27, 2023, up to and including February 27, 2023 . In exchange for the thirty (30) day extension of time to respond to the Complaint, Defendants agree not to dispute service of process. This is the first request for an extension of time to respond to the Complaint. The instant request for an extension is necessary because counsel for Defendants were recently retained and need additional time to investigate the allegations contained in the Complaint and prepare a sufficient responsive pleading thereto. This request is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.
IT IS SO ORDERED.