From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stubbs v. Mitchell

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Albany Division
Apr 5, 2009
1:06-CV-90(WLS) (M.D. Ga. Apr. 5, 2009)

Opinion

1:06-CV-90(WLS).

April 5, 2009


ORDER


Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Richard L. Hodge, filed February 19, 2009. (Doc. 20). It is recommended that Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss his Complaint be granted. Id. Additionally, in order to gain Defendant's consent to conclude this matter on Plaintiff's motion, as opposed to Defendant's previously pending Motion for Summary Judgment, it is recommended that Plaintiff's action be dismissed with prejudice. Id. No objection has been filed to date.

For clarification, the Court notes that Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss his Complaint was essentially filed in response to the Judge Hodge's Order (Doc. 18) to respond to Defendant's pending Motion for Summary Judgment. See (Doc. 20).

Upon full review and consideration upon the record, the Court finds that said Report and Recommendation (Doc. 20) should be, and hereby is, ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and made the Order of this Court for reason of the findings made and reasons stated therein. Accordingly, Plaintiff's action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Additionally, Plaintiff's Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint (Doc. 15), Plaintiffs Motion to Proceed Pro Se (Doc. 16), and Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 17) are all DENIED AS MOOT.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Stubbs v. Mitchell

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Albany Division
Apr 5, 2009
1:06-CV-90(WLS) (M.D. Ga. Apr. 5, 2009)
Case details for

Stubbs v. Mitchell

Case Details

Full title:RONALD EUGENE STUBBS, Plaintiff, v. ERNEST MITCHELL, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Albany Division

Date published: Apr 5, 2009

Citations

1:06-CV-90(WLS) (M.D. Ga. Apr. 5, 2009)