From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stubbs v. Catrett

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas
Dec 17, 1910
132 S.W. 828 (Tex. Civ. App. 1910)

Opinion

Decided December 17, 1910.

Appeal Without Statement of Facts — Practice.

When the statement of facts has been stricken from the record on appeal, and there are no bills of exception, and the assignments of error raise only such questions as can be considered in the light of a statement of facts, the judgment of the trial court must necessarily be affirmed.

Appeal from the District Court of Jefferson County.

E. E. Caruthers and A.D. Lipscomb, for appellant.

No brief for appellee.


This suit was brought by J. S. Brown Hardware Company and Charles J. Stubbs, as trustee in bankruptcy for said hardware company, against defendant Catrett and wife in the form of trespass to try title to recover 90x120 feet of land on Jackson Street in the city of Beaumont, Texas. A jury under peremptory instruction from the court returned a verdict for the defendant, upon which a judgment for defendants was duly entered, and from which, after a motion for a new trial had been overruled, plaintiffs have appealed.

At a former day of this term of the court the statement of facts brought up with the record was, on motion of appellee, stricken out. There are no bills of exception in the record. All the assignments presented by appellants for a reversal of the judgment present only such alleged errors as arose upon the facts proved, and are such as can not be considered in the absence of a statement of facts. This leaves us no discretion except to affirm the judgment of the court below, and it has been so ordered.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Stubbs v. Catrett

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas
Dec 17, 1910
132 S.W. 828 (Tex. Civ. App. 1910)
Case details for

Stubbs v. Catrett

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES J. STUBBS, TRUSTEE, v. T. E. CATRETT

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas

Date published: Dec 17, 1910

Citations

132 S.W. 828 (Tex. Civ. App. 1910)
63 Tex. Civ. App. 354

Citing Cases

Republic Ins. Co. v. Watson

In its ordinary sense, it means "empty," "not filled," "entire abandonment." 66 C.J. pp. 386, 387;…

Phœnix Assur. Co., Ltd., of London v. Shepherd

Furthermore, the finding of the jury, and the amply supporting evidence in the record, having established…