From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stubblefield v. Loomis Armored U.S.

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Aug 8, 2024
No. A25A0078 (Ga. Ct. App. Aug. 8, 2024)

Opinion

A25A0078

08-08-2024

WILMOT STUBBLEFIELD v. LOOMIS ARMORED US, LLC.


The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

In this action for fraud and related claims, pro se defendant Wilmot Stubblefield filed this direct appeal from the trial court's order scheduling a bench trial. We lack jurisdiction.

Under OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1), appeals generally may be taken from "[a]ll final judgments, that is to say, where the case is no longer pending in the court below." Here, the trial court's order scheduling a bench trial is a non-final order that did not resolve all issues in this case. Consequently, Stubblefield was required to use the interlocutory appeal procedures - including obtaining a certificate of immediate review from the trial court - to appeal the order scheduling a bench trial. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (b); Bailey v. Bailey, 266 Ga. 832, 832-833 (471 S.E.2d 213) (1996); Scruggs v. Ga. Dept. of Human Resources, 261 Ga. 587, 588-589 (1) (408 S.E.2d 103) (1991). His failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Bailey, 266 Ga. at 833.


Summaries of

Stubblefield v. Loomis Armored U.S.

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Aug 8, 2024
No. A25A0078 (Ga. Ct. App. Aug. 8, 2024)
Case details for

Stubblefield v. Loomis Armored U.S.

Case Details

Full title:WILMOT STUBBLEFIELD v. LOOMIS ARMORED US, LLC.

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Aug 8, 2024

Citations

No. A25A0078 (Ga. Ct. App. Aug. 8, 2024)