From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stuart v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 26, 2000
765 So. 2d 224 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 2D99-3701.

July 26, 2000.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140 (i) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; William Fuente, Judge.

Reversed and Remanded for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.


Anthony A. Stuart appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 (a). Stuart was sentenced on June 23, 1998, for offenses he alleges occurred in February and November 1996. The trial court motion, relying on our decision in Heggs v. State, 718 So.2d 263 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998 that suggested the relevant window to challenge the 1995 sentencing guidelines was determined by the date of sentencing. Because it is now clear that the date of offense is the relevant date, we reverse and remand for further consideration of this motion. See Smith v. State, 761 So.2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

We remand for the trial court to determine whether Stuart in fact committed his offenses within the Heggs window and, if so, whether his sentence could not have been imposed under the 1994 guidelines without a departure. If the answers to both of these questions are affirmative, then Stuart must be resentenced in accordance with the valid guidelines in existence at the time he committed his offenses. If the court enters an order declaring resentencing unnecessary, it should attach all documents necessary to reach that conclusion. See Smith.

Parker, A.C.J., and Fulmer and Stringer, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Stuart v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 26, 2000
765 So. 2d 224 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Stuart v. State

Case Details

Full title:Anthony A. Stuart, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jul 26, 2000

Citations

765 So. 2d 224 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Stuart v. State

Stuart has three prior appeals related to the present consolidated appeals. See Stuart v. State, 771 So.2d…