From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stuart v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Dec 30, 2022
No. 05-22-01282-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 30, 2022)

Opinion

05-22-01282-CR

12-30-2022

JAMES ALEXANDER STUART, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 397th Judicial District Court Grayson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 074172

ORDER

DENNISE GARCIA JUSTICE

Before the Court is appellant's motion to substitute counsel. Appellant's current counsel, Rick Dunn, requests that we substitute Jeromie Oney as counsel for appellant. We DENY the motion as filed because it does not show compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.5(b). We DIRECT the Clerk to list Jeromie Oney as lead counsel of record for appellant. All future correspondence shall be sent to Mr. Oney at the address on file with the Court.

The clerk's record and reporter's record are due by January 27, 2023.


Summaries of

Stuart v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Dec 30, 2022
No. 05-22-01282-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 30, 2022)
Case details for

Stuart v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES ALEXANDER STUART, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Dec 30, 2022

Citations

No. 05-22-01282-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 30, 2022)