From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stuart v. Quintana

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 18, 2009
Civil Action No. 08-314 Erie (W.D. Pa. Jun. 18, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08-314 Erie.

June 18, 2009


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This petition for writ of habeas corpus was received by the Clerk of Court on November 13, 2008 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, filed on May 22, 2009 [12], recommends that the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed as moot and that a certificate of appealability be denied. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Petitioner by certified mail at FCI McKean, where he is incarcerated. Petitioner has filed no objections to Magistrate Judge Baxter's Report and Recommendation. After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 18th day of June, 2009;

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be, and hereby is, DISMISSED as moot and no certificate of appealability shall issue.

The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on May 22, 2009 [12] is adopted as the opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Stuart v. Quintana

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 18, 2009
Civil Action No. 08-314 Erie (W.D. Pa. Jun. 18, 2009)
Case details for

Stuart v. Quintana

Case Details

Full title:JAMAR V. STUART, Petitioner, v. WARDEN FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 18, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 08-314 Erie (W.D. Pa. Jun. 18, 2009)