From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stuart v. Pasmore

Court of Errors and Appeals, Charlotte
Mar 1, 1818
6 Tenn. 29 (Tenn. 1818)

Opinion

March Term 1818.

The provision of 1794, 1, 66 (modified by Code, 3150), requiring the record, upon an appeal from the County to the Circuit Court, to be filed at least fifteen days before the sitting of the court, is imperative, and, on failure, the judgment must be affirmed. (Acc. Gregory v. Burnet, 1 Hum., 60.)

Appeal to the Dixon Circuit Court from the County Court; and from the Circuit Court to this court. — The cause of appealing to this court was, that, the appeal not having been brought up in fifteen days before the term, the judgment of the County Court was affirmed; where upon an affidavit was filed showing causes for a new trial, which was refused.


The motion for a new trial was properly rejected. The cause was out of court. The appellee looks at the files on the last day appointed for the return of the appeal to the clerk of the court appealed to, and, finding it not there, goes home, and is the more off his guard when his judgment is affirmed. is it possible that, thus absent and unsuspecting, a motion of so much importance can be made against him and sustained. The Circuit Court acted correctly. Could the Court refuse affirmance, and, after doing by affirmance what the law required, undo it as if it were illegal? Certainly not. If we now reverse, it will be because the Court has done what the law required. A writ of error should have been taken. The appeal is for the purpose of having a now trial. Whenever this is abandoned, and the judgment below affirmed, and the cause removed to this court, the question is upon the error of that affirmance, not upon errors not brought before the Court.

Affirm the judgment.


Summaries of

Stuart v. Pasmore

Court of Errors and Appeals, Charlotte
Mar 1, 1818
6 Tenn. 29 (Tenn. 1818)
Case details for

Stuart v. Pasmore

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW STUART, ADMINISTRATOR, v. DAVID PASMORE

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals, Charlotte

Date published: Mar 1, 1818

Citations

6 Tenn. 29 (Tenn. 1818)

Citing Cases

Brown v. Jarvis

It is seen that the section containing the provision that "the judgment, sentence, or decree of the county…