From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stuart v. Mills

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 28, 2016
Case No. CV 16-02158 GHK (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. CV 16-02158 GHK (RAO)

10-28-2016

RICKY LEE STUART, Plaintiff, v. DEPUTY MILLS, DEPUTY REYES, DEPUTY BODNAR, DEPUTY IVAN, DEPUTY BROOKS, Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING INTERIM REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint; the Motion to Dismiss "Defendant Ivan (K-9 Dog)" With Prejudice filed by Defendants Mills, Reyes, Bodnar and Brooks ("Defendants"); all of the other records and files herein; and the Interim Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"). The time for filing objections to the Report has passed, and no objections have been filed. The Court hereby accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. /// /// /// ///

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion is GRANTED and this action is dismissed with prejudice and without leave to amend as to Defendant Ivan. DATED: 10/28/16

/s/_________

GEORGE H. KING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Stuart v. Mills

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 28, 2016
Case No. CV 16-02158 GHK (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2016)
Case details for

Stuart v. Mills

Case Details

Full title:RICKY LEE STUART, Plaintiff, v. DEPUTY MILLS, DEPUTY REYES, DEPUTY BODNAR…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 28, 2016

Citations

Case No. CV 16-02158 GHK (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2016)

Citing Cases

Mota v. White

Because liability under Section 1983 is limited to "person[s]" who violate constitutional rights under color…