From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stuart v. Mass. Bay Ins. Co.

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Mar 28, 2024
4:24-cv-130-DPM (E.D. Ark. Mar. 28, 2024)

Opinion

4:24-cv-130-DPM

03-28-2024

JON STUART and AUTUMN STUART PLAINTIFFS v. MASSACHUSETTS BAY INSURANCE COMPANY DEFENDANT


ORDER

D.P. MARSHALL. JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Motion to remand, Doc. 7, denied without prejudice and with instructions. If the Stuarts file a stipulation that they will not seek a total recovery in this case from all sources in excess of the statutory amount, Bell v. Hershey Co., 557 F.3d 953, 958 (8th Cir. 2009), including by any later amendment of their complaint or otherwise, then the Court will remand. If no such stipulation is filed, the case will stay here. Any stipulation due by 10 April 2024.

So Ordered.


Summaries of

Stuart v. Mass. Bay Ins. Co.

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Mar 28, 2024
4:24-cv-130-DPM (E.D. Ark. Mar. 28, 2024)
Case details for

Stuart v. Mass. Bay Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:JON STUART and AUTUMN STUART PLAINTIFFS v. MASSACHUSETTS BAY INSURANCE…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Mar 28, 2024

Citations

4:24-cv-130-DPM (E.D. Ark. Mar. 28, 2024)