From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stuart v. Keffer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
Mar 29, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO.4:11-CV-626-Y (N.D. Tex. Mar. 29, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO.4:11-CV-626-Y

03-29-2012

WILLIE MAE STUART/STEWART, Petitioner, v. JOE KEFFER, Warden, FMC-Carswell, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

Before the Court is the petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 of petitioner Willie Mae Stuart/Stewart, along with the February 29, 2012 findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States magistrate judge. The magistrate judge gave the parties until March 20 to file written objections to the findings, conclusions, and recommendation. As of the date of this order, no written objections have been filed.

The Court has reviewed the pleadings and the record in this case, and has reviewed for clear error the proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation. The Court concludes that, for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge, the petition for writ of habeas corpus should be dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction.

Therefore, the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the magistrate judge are ADOPTED.

Willie Mae Stuart/Stewart's petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction.

______________________

TERRY R. MEANS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Stuart v. Keffer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
Mar 29, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO.4:11-CV-626-Y (N.D. Tex. Mar. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Stuart v. Keffer

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE MAE STUART/STEWART, Petitioner, v. JOE KEFFER, Warden…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

Date published: Mar 29, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO.4:11-CV-626-Y (N.D. Tex. Mar. 29, 2012)

Citing Cases

Woolfolk v. Davis

The failure of the appellees to revive the action is a complete bar to any claim the appellees might have as…

Robison v. Jones

'The failure of the appellees to revive the action is a complete bar to any claim the appellees might have as…