From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stuart v. Flower City Peat Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 27, 1964
20 A.D.2d 753 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Opinion

February 27, 1964

Appeal from the Livingston Trial Term.

Present — Williams, P.J., Bastow, Henry, Noonan and Del Vecchio, JJ.


Judgment insofar as appealed from unanimously modified in accordance with the memorandum and as modified affirmed, with costs to appellants. Memorandum: The judgment is based on the court's determination that plaintiffs are estopped from complaining of defendant's use of the drainage ditch and upon its further determination that the ditch is a natural water course. The record does not support the finding that plaintiff Helen Stuart Lowery is so estopped. The judgment should, therefore, be modified by deleting her name from the last paragraph of the judgment and by adding thereto a provision that she be enjoined from interfering with defendant's unrestricted use of the ditch as it existed in October, 1956.


Summaries of

Stuart v. Flower City Peat Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 27, 1964
20 A.D.2d 753 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)
Case details for

Stuart v. Flower City Peat Company, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:OTILIA STUART et al., Appellants, v. FLOWER CITY PEAT COMPANY, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 27, 1964

Citations

20 A.D.2d 753 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)