From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stuart v. Alexander

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Apr 5, 1935
6 Cal.App.2d 27 (Cal. Ct. App. 1935)

Opinion

Docket No. 9797.

April 5, 1935.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Ventura County setting aside a default judgment. Edward Henderson, Judge. Affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Mark H. Edwards and Julius V. Patrosso for Appellant.

M.G. Gallaher for Respondents.


[1] Plaintiff brought this action in Ventura County and served Claire H. Alexander on December 2d in Alameda County. On January 2d plaintiff directed the clerk to enter default of said defendant, which was done. Judgment was entered the same day. On January 4th defendant filed a demurrer, which came on for hearing January 15th, and was then objected to by plaintiff because of default judgment theretofore entered. The court of its own motion set aside the default on the ground that it had been prematurely entered, in that defendant had the whole day of January 2d within which to appear, because the day prior thereto, January 1st was a legal holiday.

Appellant concedes that the default and judgment were prematurely entered, and that if motion for relief had been made by defendants under section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure the court would have had jurisdiction to set aside the default, but contends that the court was powerless to thus act because of absence of such a motion. The court had jurisdiction of the cause and the parties, and if it chose to exercise its discretion to correct the error of the clerk in performing a ministerial act (which error we observe was induced by the very party who now seeks to profit by it) it had the inherent power to do so; and we are unable to say that it was an abuse of discretion to thus act, notwithstanding a formal motion directed to that specific matter had not been made by the party aggrieved.

Order affirmed.

Stephens, P.J., and Crail, J., concurred.


Summaries of

Stuart v. Alexander

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Apr 5, 1935
6 Cal.App.2d 27 (Cal. Ct. App. 1935)
Case details for

Stuart v. Alexander

Case Details

Full title:E.D. STUART, Appellant, v. S.T. ALEXANDER et al., Respondents

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two

Date published: Apr 5, 1935

Citations

6 Cal.App.2d 27 (Cal. Ct. App. 1935)
43 P.2d 557

Citing Cases

Tah v. U.S. Bank, N.A.

A court should have the power to rectify mistakes of its staff that contribute to those of counsel, such as…

Tah v. U.S. Bank, N.A.

A court should have the power to rectify mistakes of its staff that contribute to those of counsel, such as…