S.T.T v. M.E.S.

Full title: S.T.T BY AND THROUGH His Next Friend, R.T., and R.T., Individually…

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Date published: Oct 8, 2019

589 S.W.3d 91 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. ED 107477

10-08-2019

S.T.T BY AND THROUGH His Next Friend, R.T., and R.T., Individually, Respondent, v. M.E.S., Appellant.

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT, Joseph Andrew Brannon, 423 S. Main Street, P.O. Box 446, New London, MO 63459, BRISCOE AND BRANNON. ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT, Jason Elwyn Newton, 100 North Jefferson, Mexico, MO 65265, BRETT, ERDEL, OWINGS, & TANZEY, P.C., Jeffrey Kyle Basinger, Co-Counsel, 224 N. 8 Street, Columbia, MO 65201.

PER CURIAM.

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT, Joseph Andrew Brannon, 423 S. Main Street, P.O. Box 446, New London, MO 63459, BRISCOE AND BRANNON.

ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT, Jason Elwyn Newton, 100 North Jefferson, Mexico, MO 65265, BRETT, ERDEL, OWINGS, & TANZEY, P.C., Jeffrey Kyle Basinger, Co-Counsel, 224 N. 8^th Street, Columbia, MO 65201.

Before Mary K. Hoff, P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

M.E.S. ("Mother") appeals from the "Judgment and Decree of Paternity" awarding joint legal and physical custody of S.T.T. to Mother and R.T. ("Father") and ordering Father to pay Mother child support. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).