Stryker Corporation v. XL Insurance America

Full title: STRYKER CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. XL INSURANCE AMERICA, formerly…

Court: United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Aug 10, 2006

File No. 4:01-CV-157 (W.D. Mich. Aug. 10, 2006)

Opinion

File No. 4:01-CV-157.

August 10, 2006

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ROBERT BELL, Chief District Judge

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs' motion for relief from order and to supplement the record (Docket #816). Plaintiffs request that the Court correct an error in the July 14, 2006 Opinion (Docket #813). Plaintiffs contend that the Court incorrectly stated that Plaintiffs did not raise before the Magistrate Judge the issue of whether Defendant's refusal to defend Plaintiffs in the underlying suit renders the issue of whether bodily injury occurred in 2000 moot. Defendant has concurred in part in this motion. The Court has reviewed Plaintiffs' motion and accompanying brief, as well as Defendant's response brief. Based upon the concurrence of the parties, it appears that this issue was raised before the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the Court withdraws any finding contained in the July 14, 2006 Opinion that Plaintiffs failed to raise this issue before the Magistrate Judge or otherwise waived this issue.

Because the parties concur that Plaintiffs properly raised this issue before the Magistrate Judge, there is no need to supplement the record with Plaintiff's letters to the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' motion for relief from order and to supplement the record (Docket #816) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.