From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Struyk v. Samuel Braen's Sons

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 5, 1952
88 A.2d 201 (N.J. 1952)

Opinion

Argued April 28, 1952 —

Decided May 5, 1952.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Hugh C. Spernow argued the cause for the appellant ( Messrs. Evans, Hand and Evans, of counsel).

Mr. Paul Rittenberg argued the cause for the respondent ( Mr. Peter Hofstra, attorney; Mr. Howard Stern, on the brief).


The judgment under review is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge William J. Brennan, Jr., in the court below.

For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING and JACOBS — 5.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Struyk v. Samuel Braen's Sons

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 5, 1952
88 A.2d 201 (N.J. 1952)
Case details for

Struyk v. Samuel Braen's Sons

Case Details

Full title:NEIL STRUYK, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE BOROUGH OF NORTH HALEDON…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: May 5, 1952

Citations

88 A.2d 201 (N.J. 1952)
88 A.2d 201

Citing Cases

Weber v. Pieretti

They contend that prior to 1930, although they neither owned nor leased this lot, Brookdale used it with the…

Thatcher Enterprises v. Cache County Corp.

Whether the reason is called laches, estoppel, waiver, or public policy, challenges to the procedural…