From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strunk v. Conklin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 28, 1938
255 App. Div. 888 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)

Opinion

November 28, 1938.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.


Upon an agreed statement of facts, judgment unanimously directed for defendants, and the judgment will provide that defendants have a .97794 per cent interest, and plaintiffs a .02206 per cent interest, in the real property of which Kate K. Hyde died seized.


Summaries of

Strunk v. Conklin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 28, 1938
255 App. Div. 888 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)
Case details for

Strunk v. Conklin

Case Details

Full title:EMILY STRUNK, CORA ISABEL BRANDHORST, MAY LOUISE CONREY and MARGARET…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 28, 1938

Citations

255 App. Div. 888 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)