From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strouse v. Strouse

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
Feb 25, 1997
939 S.W.2d 60 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

No. 70156

OPINION FILED: February 25, 1997

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CHARLES COUNTY HON. FRANK A. CONARD.

Nathan S. Cohen, Clayton, for petitioner/appellant.

Charles E. Bridges, St. Charles, for respondent/respondent.

Before: Dowd, Jr., P.J., Reinhard, J., and Gaertner, J.



ORDER


Husband appeals from the dissolution decree entered on January 1, 1996. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Strouse v. Strouse

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
Feb 25, 1997
939 S.W.2d 60 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Strouse v. Strouse

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT W. STROUSE, Petitioner/Appellant, v. NANETTE M. STROUSE…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE

Date published: Feb 25, 1997

Citations

939 S.W.2d 60 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Bingaman v. Bingaman

Here, however, Wife timely asserted her alimony claim during the divorce litigation and Melton is starkly…