From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strouse v. Mabry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jan 6, 2021
No. 3:20-CV-3231-G-BH (N.D. Tex. Jan. 6, 2021)

Opinion

No. 3:20-CV-3231-G-BH

01-06-2021

JAMES STROUSE, #15976-078, Plaintiff, v. JASON MABRY, et al., Defendants.


Referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. The plaintiff filed motions which the court construes as objections. The District Court has made a de novo review of those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made and all other portions for plain error. The objections are overruled, and the Court ACCEPTS the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED. January 6, 2021.

/s/ _________

A. JOE FISH

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Strouse v. Mabry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jan 6, 2021
No. 3:20-CV-3231-G-BH (N.D. Tex. Jan. 6, 2021)
Case details for

Strouse v. Mabry

Case Details

Full title:JAMES STROUSE, #15976-078, Plaintiff, v. JASON MABRY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Jan 6, 2021

Citations

No. 3:20-CV-3231-G-BH (N.D. Tex. Jan. 6, 2021)

Citing Cases

Shambeck v. Dall. DOJ

(“Because [plaintiff] failed to comply with the orders that he pay the filing fee or file an [in forma…